New Blur Filter in Photoshop Works Incredibly on Portraits

Some of Photoshop's most recent updates have added some incredibly powerful editing tools. This new blur filter not only works amazingly well on landscapes images, it is stunning on portraits as well. See how to use it here.

I have to be honest and say that sometimes, I'm really confused by Adobe's roadmap, particularly when it comes to Lightroom and Photoshop. I've made no secret in the past that until very recently, I barely ever used Lightroom, as I grew up using Photoshop and never felt the need to dabble in Lightroom at all. However, some of the additions to Lightroom in the last couple of years have been very impressive, especially its powerful new masking features. That had me thinking that Adobe was lagging on Photoshop, but the neural filters that Adobe keeps releasing and updating are absolutely outstanding when you understand how to use them effectively. 

And that brings us to this great video by Glyn Dewis, in which he introduces you to the new Depth Blur filter in the Neural Filters panel. It is still in beta mode and you will have to update to the latest version of Photoshop to access it, but once you've got it, it is extremely impressive straight off the bat. As Dewis points out, most people will typically use it for landscape images because it helps you add selective blur that you can control with pinpoint accuracy on specific parts of your image. It almost acts as a post-production aperture change, if you will. But it also works extremely well on portraits, as Dewis illustrates perfectly here. Give the video a look, and let me know your thoughts.

Log in or register to post comments
12 Comments
Steve Wood's picture

Neural Filters have the potential to make a major effect on photo editing, but Adobe have a way to go in managing Memory etc. - I am getting some weird things happen if I use Depth Blur more than once without rebooting. The explanation of the coastal scene was clear & accurate - as normal. Alas the portrait was hurried and would have confused me if I had not already had a go with this feature. My vote for the future would be to start with the depth map.

STEVEN WEBB's picture

So in other words, something like what one would get with a wide aperture lens. Ok.

Eric Robinson's picture

Not really. Shoot that at f.12 with let's say a 50mm and not all the subject will be sharp and in focus. Sometimes it's not possible due to the laws of physics to do all in camera. This method gives you so much more control/ Its just another processing technique like dodge and burn that has been used for ever.

Christopher Boles's picture

I used this neural filter last night on some family outdoor portraits to blur the background and keep the focus on the subjects. I found if you go too far you get almost a 3D effect where the subjects look like they are out in front of everything. Very strange but interesting. Thank you for the explanation of all the controls, and now I have a better understanding of what can be done with the filter.

Richard Tack's picture

Superb, no nonsense instructive video.

William Salopek's picture

Another post that just redirects to a video. Which is click bait and a waste of time. Fstoppers - please - in your article's title - add the word VIDEO or some such thing so people don't have to waste their time if they don't want to.

Eric Robinson's picture

It's a very good video, straight to the point with no added crap.
.

Hector Belfort's picture

Glyn Dewis is great. Very good at explaining things and a nice guy also. His books and videos are great (and his backdrops). I know youtube drives some presenters to go all click baity and doing things they probably wouldn't ideally like to do. I like the way Glyn keeps it real.

Eric Robinson's picture

Nice one, great video and great presentation. I shall certainly seek you out for more tutorials.